A United Nations Resolution is the formal document produced and adopted by various UN bodies. In Model UN, it is a summary of the document that contains all the clauses written by the delegates during the simulation to be voted on at the end.
When preparing clauses, usually during unmoderated caucuses, it is of critical importance that your policies solve the problem (or perpetuate it), are unique yet simple enough to understand and can get a majority and fit your countries views and interests.
I’d like to point out that there are other types of clauses that fit into the preambs section but they will almost always fit into one of the above mentioned categories.
Underscoring its deep concerns on the prevalence of impunity, on the daily assassinations, on the restrictions on enjoyment of the freedom of expression, including for members of the press, and on the continued worsening of the humanitarian situation, marked by the more than 200,000 Burundian citizens seeking refuge in neighbouring countries,
Bearing in mind the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations and the primary responsibility of the Security Council under the Charter for the maintenance of international peace and security,
Recognizing the Potsdam Declaration which stated that Japanese sovereignty be limited to the islands of Honshu, Kyushu, Hokkaido, and Shikoku,
Reaffirming its commitment to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, the need for all States Party to that Treaty to comply fully with their obligations, and recalling the right of States Party, in conformity with Articles I and II of that Treaty, to develop research, production and use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes without discrimination,
Recalling its resolutions 1261 (1999) of 25 August 1999, 1265 (1999) of 17 September 1999, 1296 (2000) of 19 April 2000 and 1314 (2000) of 11 August 2000, as well as relevant statements of its President, and recalling also the statement of its President to the press on the occasion of the United Nations Day for Women’s Rights and International Peace (International Women’s Day) of 8 March 2000 (SC/6816),
Welcoming the visit recently undertaken by the representative of the Mediator in Dakar for consultations with the Government of Senegal,
The operative clause is your policy / call to action. Sometimes it is changed to compromise with another player/s. Sometimes it is stronger than you need it to be for the sake of a compromise which will get you a watered down version, which is really what you want, onto the final resolution. What is clear is that this operative clauses should be justified by the preambs and be connected to the ideas and view of the world that you have been describing and supporting in your speeches since the simulation started and are now written in a practical form of orders ready to be carried out by bureaucrats.
It is important that operative clauses have no adjectives and follow the following guidelines
Operative clauses must be:
Encourages all parties to armed conflict to comply strictly with the obligations applicable to them under international law relevant to the protection of civilians, including those who are youth, including the obligations applicable to them under the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and the Additional Protocols thereto of 1977;Operative clauses exist in their own right and should not be dependent on other clauses. If a clause need further explanation if can be divided into sub clauses, as can be seen below.
Calls on all relevant actors, including when negotiating and implementing peace agreements, to take into account, as appropriate, the participation and views of youth, recognising that their marginalisation is detrimental to building sustainable peace in all societies, including, inter alias, such specific aspects as:(a) The needs of youth during repatriation and resettlement and for rehabilitation, reintegration and post-conflict reconstruction;(b) Measures that support local youth peace initiatives and indigenous processes for conflict resolution, and that involve youth in the implementation mechanisms of peace agreements;(c) Measures to empower youth in peace-building and conflict resolution;Causes can be amended, struck out and new ones added in between other clauses. For this reason a clause needs to be able to stand alone.Looking back up, some of the examples given were from real UN resolutions and some from Model UN resolutions. While not always intuitive in structure, this form of writing can be duplicated into clear operative clauses.
A science of sponsors and signatories
In model UN - (generally)
In DISEC at ScotMUN there was a limit on sponsors. To stay relevant a delegate needed to stay part of the 4 sponsors,, which was difficult as every merger nocked two off each side.As a chair, one trick I use is when we have a panel of authors I ask only 3-4 to come up to present the resolution. Whoever the delegates make sure goes up is usually the one who knows best.In Harvard National, saw many of the same countries on all the resolutions, seemingly not caring who they voted for. It was the country's only on one document that the chairs took seriously. This was the measure for who was unique and influential both when I delegated at HNMUN 2013 and chaired Worldmunf 2014..
You don’t have to be a sponsor everywhere all the time. Ideally you will be the center of your block because you found a good clash, have a good idea and can lead the mix of different policies with your most relevant and reality changing one.
Be strategic. You can be sponsor on one and a signatory on the other. You can also be on two and vote against a third. (How to be central while voting against can be seen in article “Losing Gloriously”)
Overall, make sure to always be part of the writing – even if not the main or most central writer if you aren’t part of the paper you’re letting someone else manage the content and control the order and how it’s written.
If someone is too controlling on the draft resolution, you are likely not the only one who is disenfranchised. Find a few of them, work on your own clauses and if you come with a sufficiently sized voting block you will have more bargaining power in the later discussion than if you let someone else write everything. If delegates stood around and let the writer dictate everything I would say they deserve to have someone else take or marginalize their ideas.
The key is to remember that resolution writing isn’t scary. It can seem so at first but it is really taking the CIA concept and turning it into legal jargon with a perambulatory or operative phrase at the beginning of the sentence. Once the idea is in writing the debate continues and you continue to fight to get your idea passed with a majority.
Before a conference, take a step beyond reading previous resolutions as written in the research section. Try to write out a few clauses of your own. I’m not saying bring pre-written clauses. I personally think it bad form and many conferences don’t allow it. Also, unless you’re a diplomatic genius, it’s likely that the pre prepared clauses, if not vague, are not exactly going to fit the debate and discussion in the room. When you write clauses at home, with relevant preambs and in succession, you will have a base that when the resolution writing part starts you will be able to adapt your ideas to the debate in the room. Once you have experience writing this stage will likely not be necessary but until that point it’s a good way to break the ice and get over your fear of writing.
Resolution writing is a critical part of guiding your idea from opening speech to a successfully voted on resolution. The clauses are the policy you speak in written form.
In a nutshell
Clauses should be written:
Especially for good rooms, make sure your operative clauses are backed by preambs.